Cyber Criminals

Page 4 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:55 am

sunshine welcome to Victims Heartland. You will fit in around here. I can tell by your post. I could not agree with you more. It is BS. This is why our kids and young women are not safe in this world.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:06 am

Thank you for the welcome. I am from the Cleveland area, so this hits a bit close to home! I just wrote to the local news station, perhaps they need to do a follow up report so people know just what has happened to these people!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Posted April 25, 2010, 10:51AM/ Shawn Neelon

Post by Nama on Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:32 am

Shawn Neelon, who was just sentenced in the porn case, runs with a bunch of scum bags! I wonder what Shawn's family thinks and if they've disowned him? Or the families of all the other men that this thread is about.

Parma man accused of rape and kidnapping arrested Wednesday


Fugitive Jeffrey Grimes was arrested Wednesday night on rape and kidnapping charges.
The sexual offender also failed to register his address and threatened a Parma detective and his family, Cuyahoga County Sheriff's spokesman John O'Brien said.
Grimes, 29, of Torrington Avenue in Parma, was arrested at a West 137th Street house in Cleveland.
He is also accused of being involved in a motorcycle theft and chop shop operation.
Grimes and Estil Duncan III, 33, Jacob Carroll, 24, Shawn Neelon, 21, all of Lakewood; Jacqueline Smith, 29, William Smith, 22, Laura Duncan-Jones, 49, all of Parma; Dale Batke, 29, Sandra Grimes, 24, Jacob Karlowicz, 26, all of Cleveland; and Jeffrey Petzold, 32, of Parma Heights, are accused of stealing motorcycles between 2004 and 2009.
Duncan, Batke, Carroll and William Smith reassembled them at a chop shop in Parma, put them on new frames, got new titles and sold them, prosecutor's spokesman Ryan Miday said.
Petzold, Karlowicz, Duncan, Duncan-Jones, and the Grimes used ebay to buy the frames and sell the rebuilt bikes. Grimes, Neelon and Jacqueline Smith helped store the bikes and hide evidence, Miday said.
They are charged with engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, theft, attempted theft, receiving stolen property, attempted receiving stolen property, tampering with evidence, tampering with records, failure to comply, telecommunications fraud, forgery, conspiracy, money laundering, breaking and entering, possessing criminal tools and drug trafficking.
Grimes is due in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Tuesday for the theft case.
He was convicted of sexually battering a 17-year-old girl in July, 2004, in Parma and served two years in prison.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Let's not forget what they look like.

Post by Nama on Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:22 am


_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:38 am

sunshine wrote:Thank you for the welcome. I am from the Cleveland area, so this hits a bit close to home! I just wrote to the local news station, perhaps they need to do a follow up report so people know just what has happened to these people!
Good idea. As you can see our ace reporter here is BJ.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Wrapitup on Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:38 pm

welcome2 Sunshine!!

Linda Marie is correct. You will fit right in here. Thank your for your posts, as well.

And yes, BJ is our ace reporter and is a whiz at finding the facts on any subject.

I look forward to your posts, suggestions and observations!!

_________________
Prayers for our little HaLeigh Cummings, wherever she may be!!

Nine-tenths of wisdom is appreciation. Go find somebody’s hand and squeeze it, while there’s time.
-- Dale Dauten--

Thank you RAINE for all you ARE!! I will ALWAYS hold you in my Heart!!
avatar
Wrapitup
Founder
Founder

Join date : 2009-05-28

http://victimsheartland.forumotion.com/forum.htm

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:22 am

I am so pleased that someone from the vicinity of Cleveland has joined-----welcome sunshine! I like reading your thoughts on this. Please continue to post.
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal CHRISTOPHER BRYANT

Post by Nama on Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:55 am

COURT PASSES FOR SENTENCING AT THIS TIME. JUDGE MCDONNELL TO SPEAK TO JUDGE TIMOTHY MCMONAGLE IN REGARDS TO MENTAL HEALTH COURT TRANSFER. 09/20/2010 CPJM2 09/20/2010 14:33:46

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by CritterFan1 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:21 pm

Wonder where that man's mother is now that was so sure her son was framed and innocent. Barf
avatar
CritterFan1

Join date : 2009-06-01

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:55 pm

I'm sure she is still professing her son's innocence. It would be hard to admit to yourself, or your son, that you know he's into child porn......even when you know in your heart of hearts that it's true. We'll see soon if there are any of the 36 that don't changed their plea from not guilty to guilty.

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:05 pm

No Mother should ever have to face that kind of thing. It would be really hard for a Mom to have a pervert for a Son. BJ you have been wonderful updating this thread like you have. Thank you.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:35 pm

Twenty eight of the accused pled guilty right off the bat or changed their not guilty pleas to guilty.

One of the accused is MIA......flew the coop.

Two cases were dismissed without prejudice and I believe that means the case can be refiled in the future. It doesn't mean they were proven not guilty.

Five of the 36 are still awaiting trial and, like so many of the others, may change their plea from not guilty to guilty before their trial.

The numbers speak for themselves. These pervs are all guilty as charged IMO.








_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Wrapitup on Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:23 pm

I agree. If I were NOT GUILTY, why would I plead Guilty? Makes no sense. The police have all the proof they need. Photo's and what is taken off a laptop don't lie.

_________________
Prayers for our little HaLeigh Cummings, wherever she may be!!

Nine-tenths of wisdom is appreciation. Go find somebody’s hand and squeeze it, while there’s time.
-- Dale Dauten--

Thank you RAINE for all you ARE!! I will ALWAYS hold you in my Heart!!
avatar
Wrapitup
Founder
Founder

Join date : 2009-05-28

http://victimsheartland.forumotion.com/forum.htm

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:27 pm

If I were the mother of one of these, I think that I would be very upset over it, but, after awhile, I would plead with him to get psychological and spiritual help because there is something not right with a man who takes pleasure in watching the rape and torture of babies and children and distributes it to others.
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Wrapitup on Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:49 pm

TR, once again..I am in complete agreement. One can only stay in denial for so long.

_________________
Prayers for our little HaLeigh Cummings, wherever she may be!!

Nine-tenths of wisdom is appreciation. Go find somebody’s hand and squeeze it, while there’s time.
-- Dale Dauten--

Thank you RAINE for all you ARE!! I will ALWAYS hold you in my Heart!!
avatar
Wrapitup
Founder
Founder

Join date : 2009-05-28

http://victimsheartland.forumotion.com/forum.htm

Back to top Go down

Normal Lee Bauer

Post by Nama on Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:56 am

EFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL MICHAEL J O'SHEA PRESENT. COURT REPORTER NANCY NUNES PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT, THE DEFENDANT PLEAD NO CONTEST AND WAS FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT OF PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT, THE DEFENDANT PLEAD NO CONTEST AND WAS FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT OF MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 75, 82, 83 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT, THE DEFENDANT PLEAD NO CONTEST AND WAS FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT OF PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT, THE DEFENDANT PLEAD NO CONTEST AND WAS FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT OF POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 84 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: ALL ITEMS LISTED IN THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR FRANKIE GOLDBERG ADDRESSES THE COURT THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 6 YEAR(S). DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 2 YEARS AS TO COUNTS 1 AND 17; TO RUN CONSECUTIVE TO EACH OTHER; 2 YEARS ON ALL REMAINING COUNTS EXCEPT COUNT 84; ALL TO RUN CONCURRENT; 6 MONTHS AS TO COUNT 84 TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE JAIL TIME CREDIT FOR 1 DAY(S), TO DATE. COSTS TO BE PAID ONCE DEFENDANT IS RELEASED FROM PRISON AND PLACED ON PRC. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. **DEFENDANT CLASSIFIED AS A TIER II OFFENDER ON 7-28-10.** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT LEE BAUER, DOB: 03/13/1989, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 09/29/2010 CP1TT 10/01/2010 08:41:12

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal ARTHUR BENNETT/ $25,000.00 PERSONAL BOND POSTED ON 10/22/2010 BY DEFENDANT

Post by Nama on Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:54 pm

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH PUBLIC DEFENDER. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANKIE GOLDBERG PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 14, 19 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 64 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. NO CONTACT WITH MINORS. NO CONTACT WITHOUT CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES APPROVAL. BOND SET AT $25,000.00. BOND TYPE: PERSONAL BOND TERMS: NONE . CAPIAS RECALLED. SENTENCING SET FOR 11/15/2010 AT 09:30 AM. DEFENDANT ORDERED RELEASED. 10/18/2010 CPEDB 10/20/2010 15:00:08

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:25 pm

Who is the defendant and why in the world was he released?!? So he can go and do the same as he was doing before?!? I think all of these pedophiles & those who are in any way associated with that activity (ie. through internet "porn") should be shipped off to some deserted prison in the Arctic... far away from innocent children!!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:14 pm

He was released on bond until his sentencing. I hope he doesn't get lost on the way to the courthouse on the 15th. Just sayin'............ He shouldn't be out on bond. He should be behind bars before and after his sentencing.

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:25 am

BJ in OR wrote:He was released on bond until his sentencing. I hope he doesn't get lost on the way to the courthouse on the 15th. Just sayin'............ He shouldn't be out on bond. He should be behind bars before and after his sentencing.

I agree
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal CHRISTOPHER BRYANT

Post by Nama on Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:00 pm

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL PAUL KUZMAN PRESENT. COURT REPORTER TERRI GRIFO PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 32 OF THE INDICTMENT. COUNT(S) 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 WAS/WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 2 YEAR(S). 2 YEARS ON EACH OF COUNTS 1 THROUGH 12 AND 20 THROUGH 31; 6 MONTHS ON COUNT 32. COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT DECLARED INDIGENT. COSTS WAIVED ** DEFENDANT IS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER / CHILD VICTIM OFFENDER REGISTRANT; IN-PERSON VERIFICATION EVERY 180 DAYS FOR A PERIOD OF 25 YEARS. ** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER BRYANT, DOB: 03/19/1989, GENDER: MALE, RACE: BLACK. 10/05/2010 CPEDB 10/06/2010 09:52:51

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal ARTHUR BENNETT

Post by Nama on Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:52 am

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL DAVID GRANT PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 14, 19 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 64 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 4 YEAR(S). DEFENDANT SENTENCED TO 4 YEARS ON COUNTS 1 THRU 44; 1 YEAR AS TO COUNT 64; COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER FOR A TOTAL OF 4 YEARS. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO CALCULATE TIME AND NOTIFY THE ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY. COSTS WAIVED SUPERVISION FEE WAIVED FINE(S) WAIVED. ON 11-29-10 DEFENDANT REMANDED - SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT. **DEFENDANT TO TURN HIMSELF IN TO THE 19TH FLOOR SHERIFF'S ON MONDAY 11-29-10.** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT ARTHUR BENNETT, DOB: 01/15/1979, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 11/23/2010 CP1TT 11/29/2010 14:06:32

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal JOSE HERNANDEZ

Post by Nama on Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:05 am

PROSECUTOR JESSE CANONICO PRESENT IN COURT. DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL JOHN PARKER PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 30, 36 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 67 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 3 YEAR(S). 1 YEAR ON EACH OF COUNTS 1 THRU 29 AND 31 THRU 49; 3 YEARS ON COUNTS 30 AND 36; 6 MONTHS ON COUNT 67; ALL COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH EACH OTHER. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED. SHERIFF TO CALCULATE AND SEND WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE OHIO DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION. *** DEFENDANT FOUND TO BE A TIER II VIOLATOR BY NATURE OF HIS/HER PLEA, IN OPEN COURT AND ON THE RECORD HE/SHE WAS ADVISED OF HIS/HER DUTIES AND SIGNED THE EXPLANATION OF DUTIES AS A SEX OFFENDER ORC 2950.032. *** UPON COMPLETION OF SENTENCE SHERIFF TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT TO SEX OFFENDER UNIT TO REGISTER PURSUANT TO ORC. 2950.032. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT JOSE HERNANDEZ, DOB: 11/24/1969, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 11/23/2010 CPSKM 11/23/2010 11:24:03

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal CLIFFORD TUROCY

Post by Nama on Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:58 am

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL DAVID ROWTHORN. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 102 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTER THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DIRECTOR, PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, 2947.06(B) REPORTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE DISPOSITION OF A CASE: PSYCHIATRIC RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISPOSITION YOU ARE DIRECTED TO EXAMINE CLIFFORD TUROCY, WHO HAS PLEAD GUILTY ON CHARGE(S) OF 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.323 MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2923.24 POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. ***DEFENDANT IS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER.*** SENTENCING SET FOR 01/12/2011 AT 09:00 AM. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE R. PATRICK KELLY. 12/06/2010 CP1TT 12/07/2010 09:06:08

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal 91 persons charged so far in Cuyahoga County Internet Child Porn Crimes--now includes Presbyterian pastor

Post by TerryRose on Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:19 pm

Unholy Act: Olmsted Falls Pastor among those busted in child porn sting
Posted: Dec 16, 2010 10:27 AM EST
Updated: Dec 16, 2010 2:46 PM EST

Courtesy: St. Andrews Presbyterian Church

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH (WOIO)

- Nearly 30 people busted in an Internet child porn sting in Cuyahoga County. Among the 27 people rounded up, a pastor from Olmsted Falls.

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason, along with the Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office, Cleveland Police Department, North Olmsted Police Department, and 13 other law enforcement partners of the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force announced Operation Lake Effect. This six month investigation into child pornography has resulted in the indictments of 27 adults and charges against 3 juveniles.

Operation Lake Effect targeted traders of child pornography across the state of Ohio. Using new technology, detectives identified IP addresses being used to trade and download child pornography pictures and videos.

From May 2010 through December 2010, 46 law enforcement officers from 17 law enforcement agencies executed 54 search warrants on homes in 22 communities throughout Cuyahoga County. Officers seized 1,821 items such as computers, CDs, cell phones, flash drives, digital cameras, and webcams. 34 additional cases have been referred to 23 law enforcement agencies outside of Cuyahoga County, including one in the state of Indiana.

48-year-old Rev. Dr. Mark Griggs, and Pastor of Saint Andrew's Presbyterian Church in Olmsted Falls, was charged in a 112 count indictment that includes downloading, trading, and possessing child pornography. Between July 2008 and November 2010, Griggs traded child pornography over the Internet from his house and church. He downloaded and saved images of sexually abused children to his computer that depicted children being anally, vaginally, and digitally raped.

This is the third largest investigation into traders of child pornography. In 2008 and 2009 Ohio ICAC conducted similar operations that netted a total of 91 persons charged.

The following adult defendants were indicted on trading and possessing child pornography:

Andrew Hudson, 19, of North Olmsted
Andrew Logan, 25, of Cleveland
Christopher Cavna, 24, of Shaker Heights
Delmonte Davis, 41, of Cleveland
Edward Schallon, 51, of Cleveland
Eric Nguyen, 24, of Parma
Gareth Schakel, 20, of Lakewood
Gregory Gaebelein, 59, of North Royalton
Jacob Reese, 22, of Olmsted Falls
James Golak, 51, of Bratenahl
Joseph Hinton, 22, of Warrensville Heights
Kevin Morris, 35, of Cleveland
Kyle Cordell, 19, of North Royalton
Leonard Miller, 42, of Cleveland
Pastor Mark Griggs, 48, of Berea
Michael Hennel, 49, of Broadview Heights
Michael Kemble, 37, of South Euclid
Michael Neel, 40, of Cleveland
Nicholas Dore, 58, of Lakewood
Randy Street, 22, of Mayfield Heights
Robert Stein, 36, of Strongsville
Robert Watson, 26, of Lakewood
Shakita Adams, 26, of Cleveland
Shaun Starr, 29, of North Royalton
Stephen Siford, 46, of Garfield Heights
Troy Scott, 55, of Maple Heights
Wael Kash, 24, of North Olmsted

Prosecutor Mason started the Ohio ICAC Task Force in 2000 in Northeast Ohio. At the request of the U.S. Department of Justice, he expanded it state-wide in 2003 and has served as chair of the Task Force. The Task Force now has 308 law enforcement partners across Ohio.

©2010 WOIO. All rights reserved.


avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:07 pm

I suggest to others who have been swayed by a criminal's mother into thinking that this is all just a witch hunt of innocent people by a corrupt prosecutor, that they view the video on this page from the local news station. In it, Mr. Mason, prosecutor of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, speaks and lists generally the sickening content of the videos that these criminals have been distributing and retaining in their possession, the children being as young as 2 years old being raped in a number of different ways. Here is the page----on the right side, click on the video that is about the charge against the aforementioned Presbyterian pastor and you will see firsthand Mr. Mason speak of exactly what these criminals are in possession of.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I am so thankful that this county has a man like Mason going to bat for these innocent abused children, and thankful for all the rest of the unnamed task force who are pursuing these crimes and bringing these pervs to justice.

update on late evening news, Fox8: The minister has hired a lawyer, Mr. Milano, who has been interviewed and stated that his client knew nothing about it and is innocent, using as his defense Limewire as downloading these along with files he wanted to download. Haven't we heard this plea before? It seems to me it is easily proven because a computer always leaves a trail of who accessed and when and what a real person was doing. If Limewire is responsible for much of this, it seems to me the cops would be after Limewire for distributing this and trace the perpetrators back to the source through this avenue. However, this is a very easy defense, it seems to me, easy to say that you knew nothing about files on your own computer, downloaded and distributed by your computer without your knowledge and consent. This case needs to be investigated in a court of law and determined as to whether or not this is indeed a legitimate defense.
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:31 am

TerryRose wrote:
48-year-old Rev. Dr. Mark Griggs, and Pastor of Saint Andrew's Presbyterian Church in Olmsted Falls, was charged in a 112 count indictment that includes downloading, trading, and possessing child pornography. Between July 2008 and November 2010, Griggs traded child pornography over the Internet from his house and church. He downloaded and saved images of sexually abused children to his computer that depicted children being anally, vaginally, and digitally raped.

This is just sickening!! Barf angry

What hope do children have, when even a minister is involved with this garbage?!? God help us all!!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal MARLOWE HARPER

Post by Nama on Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:10 am

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL PAUL B DAIKER. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. ON RECOMMENDATION OF PROSECUTOR COUNT(S) 1 IS/ARE AMENDED TO PANDERING OBSCENITY 2907.32 A(2) F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417). DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING OBSCENITY 2907.32 A(2) F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS AMENDED IN COUNT(S) 1 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 02/28/2011 AT 09:00 AM. 01/21/2011 CPSXB 01/21/2011 10:21:30

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:52 pm

This is sickening. A retired cop in this community has just been sentenced to 52 years for trying to meet a 12 year old for sex and then the police finding sickening child porn on his home computer. To make matters worse, he learned how to download this horrid stuff while taking part in the sting that the task force set up in these cases. A rotten apple in every bunch. I admire the female prosecutor as she addressed this perv in court, only some of which is in this video:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal MARLOWE HARPER SENTENCED

Post by Nama on Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:11 pm

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL PAUL B DAIKER PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING OBSCENITY 2907.32 A(2) F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS AMENDED IN COUNT(S) 1 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 2 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. SUPERVISION FEES TO BE PAID AT A RATE OF $20.00 A MONTH. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: REGULAR SUPERVISION UNIT VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 1 YEAR(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. DEFENDANT CLASSIFIED A TIER I OFFENDER UNDER ADAM WALSH ACT. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. 02/28/2011 CPSXB 02/28/2011 09:57:46


Last edited by BJ on Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:44 pm; edited 1 time in total

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:42 pm

This thread is almost complete. Here are the results so far:



30 - SENTENCED
***3 - PLEADED GUILTY
***27 - RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY

1 - DEFN CAPIAS A capias is a warrant or order for arrest of a person, typically issued by the judge or magistrate in a case
2 - CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1 - SENTENCING SCHEDULED
2 - TRIAL SET FOR (stated date)
___________________________________________________
= 36

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Wrapitup on Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:50 pm

Great work, BJ!!! I know this has been a very long process and I am sure this is just one city of many where sting operations are performed.

TR, I watched the video and saw how "sorry" the police officer was. I say SORRY he got caught. He got 50 years!! He will die in prison. crazy 1


Last edited by Wrapitup on Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:57 pm; edited 1 time in total

_________________
Prayers for our little HaLeigh Cummings, wherever she may be!!

Nine-tenths of wisdom is appreciation. Go find somebody’s hand and squeeze it, while there’s time.
-- Dale Dauten--

Thank you RAINE for all you ARE!! I will ALWAYS hold you in my Heart!!
avatar
Wrapitup
Founder
Founder

Join date : 2009-05-28

http://victimsheartland.forumotion.com/forum.htm

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Praying For Faith on Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:14 am

I agree This is so sickening. We as parents try to teach our children that they can trust and look up to clergy and police officers and then we find out that the same people are are involved in child porn/any porn and the molestation of children.

I will never understand how an adult could continue to seek out children on the internet, to drive distances to meet this child with the purpose of having sex with them. These men have to know that they set up these stings to catch them. What is even more sickening is the people that are supposed to be watching out for and protecting these children are guilty of this crime.

Like TR said upthread, "A rotten apple in every bunch."

I agree

Praying For Faith

Join date : 2010-08-22

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:16 am

TerryRose wrote:This is sickening. A retired cop in this community has just been sentenced to 52 years for trying to meet a 12 year old for sex and then the police finding sickening child porn on his home computer. To make matters worse, he learned how to download this horrid stuff while taking part in the sting that the task force set up in these cases. A rotten apple in every bunch.

I agree, TR! I'm glad to hear that he at least got such a tough sentence - hopefully this will help deter others like him from following in his footsteps. It's really sad that after a full career as a cop, his life has to end in such a disgusting way! 🇳🇴

I really don't know how anyone can even view this garbage & not be sickened by it... it's just mind-boggling. It reminds me that the Internet is both a blessing & a curse! A blessing in that so much valuable information is literally "at our fingertips", as well as such awesome sites such as VH, Facebook, etc. Of course, the curse is the disgusting "child porn" industry that has destroyed so many children's lives, as well ruined the lives of adults who get caught up in it. God help us all!! crying praying
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:57 am

Bravo I feel like BJ has helped bring them to Justice with her ace reporter skills. Thanks BJ.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:29 pm

I am so very thankful to BJ for keeping up with all these cases all the way up to the verdicts for each and every one of them. This thread stands as a testimonial to all who would indulge in this behavior, that such behavior is indeed horribly wrong, morally and legally, and is punishable by law. All thanks to BJ for keeping up with this as it evolved over this past year.

avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:38 pm

I agree

Thanks for all your hard work, BJ! This isn't a pleasant topic to discuss, but so very important to saving children's lives.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal CLIFFORD TUROCY SENTENCED

Post by Nama on Wed May 18, 2011 12:24 am

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL DAVID ROWTHORN PRESENT. COURT REPORTER GERALD ABBADINI PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 102 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: A SONY COMPUTER TOWER; A 52X MAX COMPUTER TOWER; .38 CALIBER COLT HANDGUN SERIAL # HO6490H, AND A .22 CALIBER DERRINGER GUN #96563. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: THE SEX OFFENDER UNIT. THE DEFENDANT MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE ELECTRONIC HOME MONITORING PROGRAM FOR 90 DAYS (MAY ATTEND MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS AND CHURCH) SUBMIT TO RANDOM DRUG TESTING PARTICIPATE IN AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE THINKING FOR A CHANGE PROGRAM. SUBMIT TO A MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT AND RELEASE ALL INFORMATION TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. RANDOM ALCOHOL TESTING; DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER USE TO BE MONITORED BY PROBATION. FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS OF MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS AS APPROVED BY LAW. (MAXIMUM TIME ALLOWED BY LAW) DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. SUPERVISION FEES TO BE PAID AT A RATE OF $20.00 A MONTH. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE R. PATRICK KELLY. 03/18/2011 CPDXM 03/21/2011 10:47:32

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Wed May 18, 2011 12:26 am

Another slap on the wrist.

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Guest on Wed May 18, 2011 5:50 am

🇳🇴 So much for getting perverts off the street.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Normal KRISTIJAN POPI

Post by Nama on Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:23 am

8/22
DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL MICHAEL H PETERSON. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE W. CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER RICK HAMSKI PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. ON RECOMMENDATION OF PROSECUTOR COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 IS/ARE AMENDED TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417). DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS AMENDED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE DISMISSED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: ALL ITEMS SEIZED AT TIME OF ARREST DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR UP TO 3 YEARS. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. SENTENCING SET FOR 10/11/2011 AT 11:00 AM. 08/22/2011 CPMRC 08/22/2011 10:52:32

*****************************************
10/11-2011
DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL MICHAEL H PETERSON PRESENT. COURT REPORTER LUANE CAWLEY PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS AMENDED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE DISMISSED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: ALL ITEMS SEIZED AT TIME OF ARREST DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 59 MONTH(S). CTS 1-5 10 MONTHS EACH, CONSECUTIVE, CT 6- 9 MONTHS FOR A TOTAL OF 59 MONTHS POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR UP TO 3 YEARS FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. THE COURT HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COSTS OF THIS PROSECUTION. DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT KRISTIJAN POPI, DOB: 01/25/1971, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 10/11/2011 CPMRC 10/11/2011 11:19:29

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Robert Shumaker finally came out of hiding!

Post by Nama on Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:28 am

32.Shumaker, Robert, 33, Cleveland
Indicted on 50 Charges
31 x Pandering (Creation)
17 x Pandering (Sharing)
1 x Possessing Criminal Tools
1 x Illegal Use of a Minor
DEFN CAPIAS
A capias is a warrant or order for arrest of a person, typically issued by the judge or magistrate in a case

August
DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL TOM CONDOSTA. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSIE CANCONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 18, 19, 20, 21 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 22 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 50 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT CLASSIFIED TIER II SEX OFFENDER. THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. SENTENCING SET FOR 10/04/2011 AT 09:00 AM. 08/31/2011 CPDXM 09/01/2011 12:57:40

***********************************
Oct 12
DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH PUBLIC DEFENDER TOM CONDOSTA. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 18, 19, 20, 21 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 22 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 50 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: THE SEX OFFENDER UNIT. SUBMIT TO REGULAR DRUG TESTING OBTAIN / MAINTAIN VERIFIABLE EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. DEFENDANT IS NOT TO HAVE A COMPUTER. RECEIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION - FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS. REFER TO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES. SERVE 60 DAYS IN COUNTY JAIL. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 8 YEAR(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. SUPERVISION FEES TO BE PAID AT A RATE OF $20.00 A MONTH. THE COURT HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COSTS OF THIS PROSECUTION. * DEFENDANT IS CLASSIFIED AS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER. * 10/11/2011 CPEDB 10/12/2011 09:19:29

After hiding out for months this idiot barely got a slap on the wrist. head bang

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:37 am

A whole bunch of perverts down and one to go..... I bet he changes his plea like so many of the others have before his trial ever starts.

13.Diaz, Carlos, 32, Brook Park
Indicted on 33 Charges
24 x Pandering (Creation)
8 x Pandering (Sharing)
1 x Possessing Criminal Tools
TRIAL CONTINUED TO 10/31/2011


_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by laga on Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:10 am

BJ wrote:A whole bunch of perverts down and one to go.....



Down, yes, but not deep enough....
avatar
laga

Join date : 2009-05-29

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:32 pm

There are more arrests made in the same geographical area this date for child pornography.........I note that some are repeat offenders, having been convicted a year or 2 ago. There are about 30 new ones in all.......

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Good job, law enforcement!
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:38 pm

TerryRose wrote:There are more arrests made in the same geographical area this date for child pornography.........

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Good job, law enforcement!
Cleveland seems to be a real popular place for the scum of the earth to gather. I've noticed how many arrests there are for child porn in the area. I wonder how many of these 36 (besides her son), the mother that came to VH to defend her son thinks are innocent? Denial is a wonderful thing. I might deny, deny, deny if one of my sons was charged with such a hideous crime. I can't think of too many offenses that are worse than involvement in child porn, even if all you're doing is viewing it!

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:55 pm

BJ, I postulate that everywhere all of us live are equally populated by these perverts and closet perverts, deviates who think they can do what they want in the privacy of their own home internet use. Further, I think it is to the credit of the FBI in cooperation with the locals that all these perverts are going down and busted. In other areas across the nation, nobody is pursuing it, that is the difference. Given that premise, I conclude that we are indeed a very sick society in this country. JMO.

And how about that Mom? Will she ever see that what her son does is no more excusable than what any other mom's son does, if it is wrong and immoral to do? Human nature I guess. She strikes out against the victims, an all too common reaction of parents. I hope she has faced reality by now.
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Nama on Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:08 pm

I added "Cleveland child porn" to my Google alerts when this story first broke and since then I've gotten alerts whenever someone in the Cleveland area is arrested for porn. It's mind blowing! Good the LE in Cleveland is making it a priority to arrest these sickos. Now if the judges would just make an example of a few of them with a stiff sentence. Many of the accused on this thread barely got a slap on the wrist and it's disgusting!

_________________
I've never been willing to sacrifice functionality for beauty ~ My Father
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:30 pm

Actually, I think it is Cuyahoga County, not the city of Cleveland, Ohio that gets the credit. All the resources are centered in the main city of Cleveland, such as the Cuyahoga county prosecutor, Bill Mason, who that Mom tried to defame when her son was arrested. BTW, he is still in office and performing his duties therein as always. There have been widescale corruption cases in county government, but he nor any law enforcement has been connected in any way to this group of office holders.

I agree it is disgusting that they get a slap on the wrist, but it is a start. Better to do something and have that something stand on their record as a crime than to do nothing like other areas of the country. It was not that long ago that people didn't think such a thing on the internet was even wrong, and that it was a man's right to freedom of speech to ogle these abused children on the internet. We are making headway and sites like VH help to get the word out that this is WRONG, legally and morally.
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by TerryRose on Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:07 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
avatar
TerryRose

Join date : 2009-05-31

Back to top Go down

Normal One to go!

Post by Nama on Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:40 am

BJ wrote:A whole bunch of perverts down and one to go..... I bet he changes his plea like so many of the others have before his trial ever starts.

13.Diaz, Carlos, 32, Brook Park
Indicted on 33 Charges
24 x Pandering (Creation)
8 x Pandering (Sharing)
1 x Possessing Criminal Tools
TRIAL CONTINUED TO 10/31/2011
CR-09-532195-A THE STATE OF OHIO vs. CARLOS DIAZ
TRIAL PREVIOUSLY SET FOR 10/31/2011 AT 09:00AM IS RESET FOR 12/05/2011 AT 09:00AM AT THE REQUEST OF STATE.
avatar
Nama
Administration
Administration

Join date : 2009-05-28

Back to top Go down

Normal Re: Cyber Criminals

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum