Cyber Criminals

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL FERNANDO MACK. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE W. CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 38 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF TIER 2 SEX OFFENDER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO SENTENCING THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 06/29/2010 AT 11:30 AM. 06/01/2010 CPJCB 06/01/2010 13:13:25

And you know they will be good at first and then be back online in no time where they shouldn't be. I don't understand these judges at all!!

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL CHRISTINE SUPPLER PRESENT. COURT REPORTER ROBERT LLOYD PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 22, 39, 41 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 47 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE DISMISSED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS, EQUIPMENT, ITEMS FOUND TO CONTAIN CHILD PORNOGRAPHY DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: INTENSIVE SPECIAL PROBATION SUPERVISION UNIT DEFENDANT ORDERED TO SUBMIT TO REGULAR DRUG TESTING SUBMIT TO RANDOM DRUG TESTING DEFENDANT MAY ONLY HAVE A COMPUTER FOR WORK PURPOSE ONLY. DEFENDANT MUST PROVIDE THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH COMPUTER PASSWORD AND ACCESS AT ANY TIME. DEFENDANT IS RESTRICTED FROM FREQUENTING PLACES WHERE YOUNG PEOPLE MAY BE FOUND. DEFENDANT IS TO CONTINUE WITH COUNSELING WITHGARY ECAC. DEFENDANT MUST NOTIFY THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT ONCE COUNSELING STOPS. DEFENDANT IS TO PARTICIPATE IN SEX OFFENDER UNIT SUPERVISION. DEFENDANT IS CLASSIFIED AS A TIER II OFFENDER AND FOR A PERIOD OF 25 YEARS MUST REGISTER HIS HOME ADDRES, PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT OR SCHOOL WITH THE SHERIFFS IN THE COUNTY WHERE HE RESIDES AND MUST VERIFY THESE ADDRESSES EVERY 108 DAYS. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 5 YEAR(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A SUPERVISION FEE IN THE SUM OF $ 500.00. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR ALL SEX RELATED FELONIES AND FOR UP TO 3 YEARS FOR POSSESSION OF CRIMINAL TOOLS. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. 06/14/2010 CPCGV 06/14/2010 15:28:34

WILLIAM KRAVITZ

06/17/2010 06/17/2010 P MO STATE'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, FILED.
06/17/2010 06/17/2010 D1 MO DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, FILED.
06/15/2010 06/15/2010 D1 MO DEFENDANT'S RESPECTFUL MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING HIM TO FILE A DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL, FILED.

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL STEVE W CANFIL, WILLIAM DOYLE PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 73 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. ORAS OFFICER DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DIRECTOR, PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, 2947.06(B) REPORTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE DISPOSITION OF A CASE: PSYCHIATRIC RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISPOSITION YOU ARE DIRECTED TO EXAMINE JONATHAN BOSWORTH, WHO HAS PLEAD GUILTY ON CHARGE(S) OF 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR STATE OF OHIO ORDERED TO NOTIFY VICTIM OF DATE & TIME OF SENTENCING. SENTENCING SET FOR 08/13/2010 AT 09:30 AM. 06/21/2010 CPMG2 06/21/2010 13:03:50

BJ in OR wrote:WILLIAM KRAVITZ

06/17/2010 06/17/2010 P MO STATE'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, FILED.
06/17/2010 06/17/2010 D1 MO DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, FILED.
06/15/2010 06/15/2010 D1 MO DEFENDANT'S RESPECTFUL MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING HIM TO FILE A DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL, FILED.

The defendant, Kravitz, wants his motion sealed. Maybe to prevent him from not getting hired if he is found not guilty???? Just a guess.

35 out of 36 plead guilty!!! :cheering:

I know. They know their goose is cooked as LE has all the video. There are a few others we are still waiting on.

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL RON FRYE. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS WITHDRAWN. DEFENDANT HAS INDEPENDENT PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATIONS TO PRESENT TO THIS COURT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 20 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 31 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. ***TIER II OFFENDER*** DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DIRECTOR, PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, 2947.06(B) REPORTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE DISPOSITION OF A CASE: PSYCHIATRIC RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISPOSITION YOU ARE DIRECTED TO EXAMINE DAVID DILLEN, WHO HAS PLEAD GUILTY ON CHARGE(S) OF 2907.322 PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR, 2923.24 POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 08/04/2010 AT 09:00 AM. 06/29/2010 CPDXM 06/30/2010 09:34:59

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL FERNANDO MACK PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 38 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO SENTENCING DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 2 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: THE SEX OFFENDER UNIT. TO SUBMIT TO REGULAR ALCOHOL TESTING SUBMIT TO REGULAR DRUG TESTING SUBMIT TO A TASC ASSESSMENT ATTEND AA/NA/CA MEETINGS, 3 PER WEEK, PROVIDE PROOF OF MEETINGS TO THE SUPERVISING OFFICER. OBTAIN / MAINTAIN VERIFIABLE EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. DEFENDANT TO SERVE TEN CONSECUTIVE WEEKENDS IN THE COUNTY JAIL (REPORT TO THE JAIL ON 07/02/2010 AT 5:00 PM TO BE RELEASED ON 07/04/2010 AT 5:00 PM) FOLLOW ALL TASC RECOMMENDATIONS, SCRAM MONITORING, ABSOLUTELY NO PORNOGRAPHY. ANY VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN A PRISON TERM OF 4 YEARS. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A SUPERVISION FEE IN THE SUM OF $ 200.00. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF TIER 2 SEX OFFENDER REPORTING AND REGISTERING REQUIREMENTS. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE OF OHIO: ACER COMPUTER, WIRELESS ROUTER. 06/29/2010 CPJCB 06/29/2010 14:06:30

Rostance, Kyle, 20, Lakewood
Indicted on 29 Charges
26 x Pandering (Sharing)
2 x Pandering (Creation)
1 x Possessing Criminal Tools
CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT IS DISCHARGED AS TO THIS CASE.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Kyle Rostance Finaly back BABY, On my way guys.
July 2 at 11:02pm

Kyle Rostance
LAKEWOOD, OH 44107-0000
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal of a legal case which permits the plaintiff to bring the claim again, unlike a dismissal with prejudice, in which the matter is considered final. There are a number of reasons for a case to be dismissed without prejudice, including on the plaintiff's request or because the judge feels that the plaintiff cannot prove the case. For defendants, it is important to be aware that this type of dismissal carries some risks because it leaves them exposed to the possibility that another case will be filed.
In legal terms, “prejudice” has to do with rights and privileges. In the case of a dismissal without prejudice, it indicates that the privileges and rights of the plaintiff are not waived, truncated, or terminated. This allows the plaintiff to refile in the future, if this is desired. When a judge dismisses with prejudice, it indicates that the right to bring suit again on the same claim has been terminated and the dismissal is final.

Sometimes a plaintiff will request a dismissal without prejudice to enable a refiling of the case. Another reason to actively request a dismissal without prejudice might be if the plaintiff and the defendant can reach a settlement, which would make the legal case unnecessary. Judges may also determine that there are problems with the case which merit a dismissal. Cases can be dismissed before they even start, or at any point during the presentation of the case in court.

When a case is dismissed without prejudice because a settlement has been reached, it leaves the possibility of refiling open. This is advantageous for the plaintiff because it means that if the other party fails to uphold the terms of the agreement, the plaintiff can bring the case back to court. In this case, the plaintiff would file a motion for a dismissal without prejudice, which would likely be granted after the reaching of a settlement had been demonstrated.

On the other hand, judges will dismiss with prejudice when they feel that the matter can be taken no further, even with a refiling. If the plaintiff filed a nuisance suit, failed to abide by the rules of the court, or acted in bad faith, the judge will be more likely to dismiss with prejudice so that the case cannot be taken before a court again. Once dismissed with prejudice, the issue is considered settled in the eyes of the law, no matter how the parties to the suit might feel.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thanks for the explanation in detail, BJ. If you look at this dude's facebook, I don't think it will be long before he is back in the system. Unreal!!!

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL MICHAEL J GOLDBERG PRESENT. COURT REPORTER TRACY VARGO PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46, 48 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 57 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 4 YEAR(S). 4 YEARS ON COUNTS 1 THROUGH 48; 6 MONTHS ON COUNT 57. COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE JAIL TIME CREDIT FOR 1 DAY(S), TO DATE. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. ** DEFENDANT IS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER / CHILD VICTIM OFFENDER REGISTRANT; IN-PERSON VERIFICATION EVERY 180 DAYS FOR A PERIOD OF 25 YEARS. ** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT RICHARD MCINTYRE, DOB: 06/27/1969, GENDER: MALE, RACE: OTHER. 07/14/2010 CPEDB 07/15/2010 16:22:59

DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 32 OF THE INDICTMENT. COUNT(S) 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 IS/ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. TIER II SEX OFFENDER; REPORT EVERY 6 MONTHS FOR 25 YEARS. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: TO BE DETERMINED. THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. URINE SAMPLE TODAY. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. SENTENCING SET FOR 08/23/2010 AT 09:00 AM. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE MICHAEL J CORRIGAN. 07/14/2010 CPDXM 07/14/2010 14:51:13

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL JOHN PARKER. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JESSE W. CANONICO PRESENT. COURT REPORTER LUANN CAWLEY PRESENT. DEFENDANT FULLY ADVISED IN OPEN COURT OF HIS/HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 30, 36 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT RETRACTS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 67 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS ARE NOLLED. COURT ACCEPTS DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA. DEFENDANT TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TIER II VIOLATOR. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 08/26/2010 AT 11:00 AM. 07/22/2010 CPSKM 07/22/2010 13:03:07

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL MICHAEL J GOLDBERG PRESENT. COURT REPORTER TRACY VARGO PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46, 48 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 57 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 4 YEAR(S). 4 YEARS ON COUNTS 1 THROUGH 48; 6 MONTHS ON COUNT 57. COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE JAIL TIME CREDIT FOR 1 DAY(S), TO DATE. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. ** DEFENDANT IS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER / CHILD VICTIM OFFENDER REGISTRANT; IN-PERSON VERIFICATION EVERY 180 DAYS FOR A PERIOD OF 25 YEARS. ** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT RICHARD MCINTYRE, DOB: 06/27/1969, GENDER: MALE, RACE: OTHER. 07/14/2010 CPEDB 07/15/2010 16:22:59

Two sexual offenders recently appeared in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court.

Richard McIntyre, 41, of Cleveland, was sentenced July 14 to four years in prison and classified a sexual offender after pleading guilty to 39 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor.



McIntyre collected child pornography from the Internet last year, including more than 50 videos. The pornography included children as young as 3 years old being raped by men.

In an unrelated case, Christopher Bryant, 21, of Garfield Heights, pleaded guilty July 14 to 24 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor.



Bryant will be classified a sexual offender who, like McIntyre, will have to register his home and work addresses with a county sheriff every 180 days for 25 years.

Prosecutors said he collected child pornography from the Internet last year. The images he downloaded included children as young as 6 being raped by men.

He will be sentenced Aug. 23 by Judge Michael Corrigan.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It sends cold chills up my spine to think that grown men would look at this sort of thing. Having young children or grandchildren, I just want to scream when I see or hear of these perverts. They should all be in prison for life!! These sentences are definitely NOT strong enough. I do not understand the judges mindset at all!!!

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL MICHAEL J O'SHEA. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANKIE GOLDBERG PRESENT. COURT REPORTER BOB INTORCIO PRESENT. DEFENDANT WITHDRAWS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND ENTERS A PLEA OF NO CONTEST TO COUNT(S) 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84. THE COURT ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES AND UPON THE EVIDENCE PROFFERED FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 OF THE INDICTMENT. THE COURT ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES AND UPON THE EVIDENCE PROFFERED FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 75, 82, 83 OF THE INDICTMENT. THE COURT ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES AND UPON THE EVIDENCE PROFFERED FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 OF THE INDICTMENT. THE COURT ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PENALTIES AND UPON THE EVIDENCE PROFFERED FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 84 OF THE INDICTMENT. ***BRIEF ON MERGING COUNTS FOR SENTENCING DUE 09/15/2010. SENTENCING BRIEF DUE 09/15/2010.*** DEFENDANT TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TIER II SEX OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: ALL ITEMS LISTED IN THE INDICTMENT. THE DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT. DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. ORIGINAL BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 09/20/2010 AT 08:00 AM. 07/28/2010 CPDXM 07/29/2010 08:52:29

*****************************************************

DEFENDANT IS REFERRED TO COURT PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC. DIRECTOR, PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, 2947.06(B) REPORTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE DISPOSITION OF A CASE: 2950.09 HB180 SEXUAL PREDATOR CLASSIFICATION YOU ARE DIRECTED TO EXAMINE LEE BAUER, WHO HAS PLEAD GUILTY ON CHARGE(S) OF................................................................... PSYCH DEPT. TO CONDUCT AN ABLE ASSESSMENT. DEFENDANT'S ADDRESS IS 475 SOM CENTER RD., MAYFIELD, OHIO 44143-0000. THE DEFENDANT IS REPRESENTED BY MICHAEL J O'SHEA (440)356-2700. 07/28/2010 CP1RB 07/28/2010 09:21:46



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Did I read that right some of them are only serving half of their sentence? One is being committed to a mental hospital? These crimes are shocking and make me ill when I read children being raped by Men.

David Dillen, 37, of Rocky River: Sentencing Wednesday, 8/11, by Judge Bridget McCafferty for downloading and sharing child pornography from March 2 to April 22, 2009. Investigators found 24 videos of child pornography that included children as young as 6 being raped by adult men. He pleaded guilty to 10 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor and possessing criminal tools. He will be labeled a sexual offender who has to register his home and work addresses every 180 days for 25 years.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Amazing, isn't it? Do these people have something wrong functioning in their brain? What brings on this type of behavior? I am sure it is very difficult for family members to grasp. I know it would be if this were my child. It's really inexcusable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And just plain SICK!

David Dillen got no prison time?
Why? Why are these perverts being let off so easy?

Apparently so they can do it again, spend more of the tax payers money and Finally end up in prison.

From March 2, 2009, to April 22, 2009, David Dillen, 37, of Rocky River, downloaded and made child pornography available for sharing over the Internet from his home computer.

On June 25, 2009, investigators executed a searched David Dillen's residence in Rocky River and seized evidence including David Dillen's desktop computer and his laptop computer. Forensic examinations of Dillen's two computers revealed a total of 24 child pornographic videos that had been saved as far back as January 3, 2007.

David Dillen's child pornography included children as young as 6-years-old engaged in oral, vaginal, and anal intercourse with adult males.

On June 29, 2010, David Dillen pleaded guilty to 10 counts of pandering sexually oriented material involving a minor and 1 count of possessing criminal tools. David Dillen will be labeled as a Tier II Sexual Offender.

David Dillen's sentencing is scheduled for 1:30 pm in front of Judge Bridget McCafferty.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by lindamarie on Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:11 pm David Dillen got no prison time? Why? Why are these perverts being let off so easy?

David Dillen is being sentenced today, Aug 11.

Thanks for the update, BJ. To look at him, you would never think he is a sex offender. I am sure his family is having a hard time dealing with the reality of it all.

You can't judge a book by it's cover, Wrap. I'm sure that the parents of most of these men (and one woman) are totally shocked that their children were engaged in child porn. That wouldn't be an easy thing for any of us to accept.

No, it wouldn't. I know I would be in complete denial.

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL RON FRYE PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 20 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 31 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT TO FORFEIT TO THE STATE: COMPUTERS AND EQUIPMENT. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11. THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 8 YEAR(S). DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 8 YEARS AS TO COUNTS 1, 2 AND 3; 1 YEAR AS TO COUNT 31; 3 YEARS AS TO COUNT 7, 12 AND 20; COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER FOR AN AGGREGATE SENTENCE OF 8 YEARS. POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDER R.C.2967.28. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE JAIL TIME CREDIT FOR 1 DAY(S), TO DATE. COURT ATTACHES MEDICATION OBJECTIVES OF DEFENDANT'S PHYSICIAN AND ORDER AN IMMEDIATE MEDICAL EXAMINATION AS WELL AS A REVIEW OF PRESCRIPTIONS. DEFENDANT DECLARED INDIGENT. COSTS WAIVED FINE(S) WAIVED. **DEFENDANT LABELED AS TIER II SEX OFFENDER. ** DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT DAVID DILLEN, DOB: 03/26/1973, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 08/11/2010 CP1TT 08/12/2010 14:04:23

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL DANIEL W TAYLOR PRESENT. COURT REPORTER ELLEN RASSI PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 61 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: THE SEX OFFENDER UNIT. OBTAIN / MAINTAIN VERIFIABLE EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. NO CHILD RELATED EMPLOYMENT, POLYGRAPH EVERY THREE MONTHS, CONTINUE WEEKLY TREATMENT WITH DR. LAHNER AND MONTHLY TREATMENT WITH DR. PALLAS, REMAIN MEDICALLY COMPLIANT AS PRESCRIBED, INSTALL BLOCKS ON COMPUTER FOR PORNOGRAPHY, FOLOW REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A SUPERVISION FEE IN THE SUM OF $ 200.00. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. 06/24/2010 CPMRC 06/24/2010 12:16:48

****************************

PROBATION DEPARTMENT ORDERED TO MONITOR ALL ACTIVITY ON THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER. MONITORING SOFTWARE TO BE PURCHASED AT DEFENDANT'S EXPENSE AND TO BE DOWNLOADED TO THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER AND MONITORED FROM THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. 07/09/2010 CPMRC 07/09/2010 10:15:11

They really threw the book at that David Dillen. WOW!!!!

08/04/2010 N/A JE NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY AS OF AND FOR 06/21/2010. ON EACH OF THE 50 FELONIES OF THE SECOND DEGREE, THE SENTENCE WILL BE THE SAME. $5,000.00 IN COSTS, FIVE YEARS AT LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION. THEY'LL ALL BE CONCURRENT. ON THE FELONY OF THE FIFTH DEGREE, THE SENTENCE OF THE COURT WILL BE $2,500.00 IN COSTS, 12 MONTHS. IT WILL ALSO BE CONCURRENT. TOTAL $5,000.00 FINE AND COSTS. TOTAL 5 YEARS IN PRISON. **SEX OFFENDER TIER 2** POST RELEASE CONTROL EXPLAINED. 07/27/2010 CP1TT 07/28/2010 08:23:18
**********************************
08/16/2010 N/A CS COURT COST ASSESSED WILLIAM KRAVITZ BILL AMOUNT 5252 PAID AMOUNT 85 AMOUNT DUE 5167
**********************************
PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT MADE ON BEHALF OF KRAVITZ/WILLIAM/ IN THE AMOUNT OF $5167.00 PAYMENT SENT IN BY MICHAEL C. HENNENBERG, ESQ - 5910 LANDERBROOK DR., SUITE 200 - CLEVELAND, OHIO 44124 - (440) 544-2000

Christopher Bryant, 21, of Maple Heights: Sentencing Monday by Judge Nancy McDonnell for sharing child pornography on the Internet last year that included children as young as 6 being raped by adult men. He pleaded guilty to 24 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving children and possessing criminal tools. He will have to register his home and work addresses every 180 days for 25 years.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Kelly Quick, 51, of Cleveland: Sentencing Tuesday by Judge Stuart Friedman for sharing child pornography on the Internet from April to June 2009. Police found 25 videos of child pornography in his computer that included children as young as 8. He pleaded guilty to 43 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor, illegal use of a minor in nude material and possessing criminal tools. He will have to register his home and work addresses every 180 days for 25 years.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That's it??? How are these judges deciding which ones go to prison and which ones simply have to register?? Unreal!!!!!!!!! No wonder our kids keep getting lost or murdered or worse!!!

The last two haven't been sentenced yet. They will be on Tuesday and Wednesday. Hopefully they WILL get some time in the Big House.

They better!! I wish they would just castrate all of them and poke their eyes out.

Wonder how the son of one of the poster's fared?

Tell us how you really feel, Wrap. :jaw dropping:

by Wrapitup on Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:08 am
Thanks for the explanation in detail, BJ. If you look at this dude's facebook, I don't think it will be long before he is back in the system. Unreal!!!

It seems that he is in the Military and maybe that's why his case was dismissed without prejudice. He's back to his base and on his way to Italy according to his FB.

DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH PUBLIC DEFENDER . COURT REPORTER MARY JO BADEN PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 38 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 45 OF THE INDICTMENT. DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT, PROSECUTOR ADDRESSES THE COURT. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. PER STATEMENT BY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, ALL MATERIALS SEIZED FROM DEFENDANT THAT CONTAIN CONTRABAND ARE TO BE FORFEITED (ORDER TO FOLLOW); ALL OTHER MATERIALS WILL BE RETURNED TO DEFENDANT BY THE STATE OF OHIO. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: REGULAR SUPERVISION UNIT SUBMIT TO RANDOM DRUG TESTING DEFENDANT REMANDED FOR PLACEMENT INTO A RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FOR SIX MONTHS. TO BE SCREENED FOR PLACEMENT INTO NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER (CBCF) OR OTHER FACILITY APPROVED BY PROBATION DEPARTMENT. THE COURT AUTHORIZES ACOPY OF THE PSI REPORT AND PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS TO BE GIVEN TO THE CBCF FOR PURPOSES OF SCREENING, EVALUATION, AND CASE PLANNING. IF ELIGIBLE, TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE ENTIRE PROGRAM AND FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS. SHERIFF TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT TO NORTWEST COMMUNITY CORR. CENTER, 1740 EAST GYPSY LANE, BOWLING GREEN, OHIO (419-354-7444). IF DEFENDANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF CBCF PROGRAM, IS TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY AND RETURNED TO CUYAHOGA COUNTY JAIL WITHOUT BOND PENDING HEARING AND FURTHER DECISION OF THIS COURT. NO UNSUPERVISED ACCESS TO INTERNET OR JUVENILES. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 8 YEAR(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. SENTENCE WILL BE 8 YEARS EACH COUNT (1-44) CONCURRENT AND CONCURRENT WITH 1 YEAR ON COUNT 45. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. DEFENDANT DECLARED INDIGENT. COSTS WAIVED SUPERVISION FEE WAIVED DEFENDANT REMANDED. SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT KELLY QUICK, DOB: 10/02/1958, GENDER: MALE, RACE: WHITE. 08/25/2010 CPSAF 08/25/2010 14:55:32

From April 2009 to June 2009, Kelly Quick, 51, of Cleveland, was found to be in possession and sharing pornography. On July 2, 2009, a search warrant was executed and numerous items were confiscated and analyzed, revealing 25 videos of child pornography saved to his hard drive.

The images depicted nude teenage boys and some children as young as 8 and 9-years-old. On February 22, 2010, Kelly Quick pleaded guilty to 43 counts of pandering sexually oriented matter involving a minor, 1 count of illegal use of a minor in nude material or performance, and 1 count of possessing criminal tools.

Kelly Quick faces a maximum of 353 years in prison. He will be classified a Tier II Sexual Offender. Upon release from prison, he must verify residence and place of employment every 180 days and cannot live within 1,000 feet of a school for 25 years.

Kelly Quick’s sentencing is scheduled for 9:00 am in front of Judge Stuart Friedman.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

BJ in OR wrote:“The images and videos being traded by these 50 defendants depict the most horrific acts of violence inflicted on children these are pictures and videos of infants, toddlers and young children being sexually tortured by adults,” said Mason.

This is exactly what "child porn" is all about!! There is no pleasure or gratification for the children - they are being tortured & perhaps even killed for the sick pleasure of some perverts!! I just recently came across this thread, and although I am glad that LE is trying to track down & arrest these monsters who abuse innocent children... I am totally disgusted & sickened by it!

I have a 10 year old son, and I am VERY careful to know where he is at all times & who he is with. Yet, I just don't trust anyone anymore... this world has gone crazy!! I pray everyday that God will defeat the evil men who torture innocent children - I know they will not go unpunished!

BTW, I like Wrap's suggestion that they should all be castrated!! Great idea!!

Kelly Quick faces a maximum of 353 years in prison. He will be classified a Tier II Sexual Offender. Upon release from prison, he must verify residence and place of employment every 180 days and cannot live within 1,000 feet of a school for 25 years

That is such a ridiculous statement for them to make.

Rainbow, I know of a person whose son was convicted of these crimes..who PLED GUILTY..and blames Mason for everything. As you are doing with your ten year old, you are protecting him..watching him..that he is out of harms way. I find it mind boggling that some parents..no matter what their adult child does..blames the law or a political figure or "the system" on what a sick thing their adult child did.

Just like Cindy...

This was posted this morning.. One of the last to be sentenced.. This person also had another case that was pending and they merged the two together.. the other was for a sting for stealing motorcycles.. how can they say that 20 days in jail and 3 yrs probation "WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE" This is absolutely ridicules and makes a mockery of what they did! I am deeply sickened.

(this first one was for the receiving stolen property for the motorcycle sting..

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL STEVE W CANFIL / BUD DOYLE PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 2913.51 A F5 AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 46 OF THE INDICTMENT. COUNT(S) 1, 40, 41 WAS/WERE NOLLED. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 3 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: REGULAR SUPERVISION UNIT SUBMIT TO REGULAR DRUG TESTING OBTAIN / MAINTAIN VERIFIABLE EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 18 MONTH(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR UP TO 3 YEARS. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A SUPERVISION FEE IN THE SUM OF $ 200.00. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. 09/07/2010 CPDXM 09/08/2010 15:18:12

One of the the arrested in child porn sting...

DEFENDANT IN COURT. COUNSEL STEVE W CANFIL & BUD DOYLE PRESENT. COURT REPORTER PRESENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(2) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR 2907.322 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 13, 16, 18, 19 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE 2907.323 A(1) F2 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 14 OF THE INDICTMENT. ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY TO POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS 2923.24 A F5 WITH FORFEITURE SPECIFICATION (2941.1417) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 23 OF THE INDICTMENT. REMAINING COUNTS WERE NOLLED. THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW. THE COURT FINDS THAT A COMMUNITY CONTROL SANCTION WILL ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND WILL NOT DEMEAN THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 3 YEAR(S) OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DEFENDANT TO ABIDE BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT TO BE SUPERVISED BY: REGULAR SUPERVISION UNIT THE SEX OFFENDER UNIT. DEFENDANT TO PERFORM COURT COMMUNITY WORK SERVICE FOR 200 HOURS. SUBMIT TO REGULAR DRUG TESTING OBTAIN / MAINTAIN VERIFIABLE EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED TO 20 DAYS LOCAL INCARCERATION BEFORE NOVEMBER; DEFENDANT ALLOWED TO PAY TO STAY.[/b] FOLLOW UP PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT, FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS. VIOLATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MORE RESTRICTIVE SANCTIONS, OR A PRISON TERM OF 4 YEAR(S) AS APPROVED BY LAW. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF POST RELEASE CONTROL FOR 5 YEARS MANDATORY. DEFENDANT ADVISED THAT IF POST RELEASE CONTROL SUPERVISION IS IMPOSED FOLLOWING HIS/HER RELEASE FROM PRISON AND IF HE/SHE VIOLATES THAT SUPERVISION OR CONDITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL UNDER RC 2967.131(B), PAROLE BOARD MAY IMPOSE A PRISON TERM AS PART OF THE SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE-HALF OF THE STATED PRISON TERM ORIGINALLY IMPOSED UPON THE OFFENDER. THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A SUPERVISION FEE IN THE SUM OF $ 200.00. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS. 09/07/2010 CPEDB 09/08/2010 10:27:48

sunshine welcome to Victims Heartland. You will fit in around here. I can tell by your post. I could not agree with you more. It is BS. This is why our kids and young women are not safe in this world.