O.J. Simpson

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Simpson was convicted of kidnapping and robbery in October of last year, after allegedly orchestrating a “sting” for long lost memorabilia in a low-end Las Vegas hotel room. Of his five companions during the incident, only Stewart remained at the defense table with the notorious former football great; the rest struck deals with the state, and testified. Stewart, too, was convicted on all counts.

Galanter, O J Simpson's attorney, argued before the STATE Supreme Court In Nevada on Monday for O J's release, calling the trial a SCAM!

A 3 Judge Panel did not indicate when it will reach a decision.

Should OJ be released while awaiting his appeal?

NOT ONLY NO, BUT HAIL NO!!!!!!!!! :evil:

wrapitup,

I wholeheartedly AGREE!

You just gotta love the times we live in! That VIDEO was what GOT him convicted, IMO. It showed OJ for the CRIMINAL he is.

After his trial, I watched an interview with the jurors, they all agreed the VIDEO said it ALL! If Galanther isn't working PRO BONO, why isn't that MONEY going to the GOLDMAN's from the CIVIL Case?

What has happened to Nicole's children? Is Arnel raising them????

um no OJ, you were convicted, thats it!

:panda: where did this come from? No he should not get out pending appeal. Where do these people get off asking for special treatment?

NEVADA Supreme Court Considers Releasing Simpson! Lawyers To Argue for BOND Pending Appeal!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

okay, feel free to slap me around here.......

He was set free for the horrible tragedy that occured w/ Nicole and her friend (I cannot remember his name, sorry)

Then he was convicted of stealing his own items (whatever it was- petty thief)

I think the justice system failed (excluding the fact he had a great set of lawyers) the first time and I think people/the system tried to make up for it the second time. I am not fond of this.

one more note: Lets remember who we are talking about here. His actions, so speak, for themselves. It does not matter where he is, he is what he is and the whole world knows it.

actually ladyjustice, he was also convicted of wrongful imprisonment and threatening with a firearm.. not petty theif, what he was convicted of was a felony. even if he was innocent of the murders, he still was convicted and deserves the sentence he got.

And ladyjustice, THOSE ITEMS didn't belong to him, he HAD HIDDEN THOSE ASSETS from FRED GOLDMAN that GOLDMAN was awarded in a CIVIL SUIT. They didn't belong to OJ ANYMORE! The memorabilia belonged to Fred Goldman, when they went to his home to confiscate the items after the CIVIL trial, they were gone. To hide your assets is also a crime. So while OJ thought he was screwing OVER the GOLDMAN's one more time, he was the one that was ULTIMATELY SCREWED.
K A R M A !

ladyjustice, the guy was Ron Goldman, just a nice kid at the wrong place at the wrong time. His father, Fred Goldman, was awarded a huge CIVIL Suit for the WRONGFUL death of RON. OJ was FOUND GUILTY in that TRIAL. Johnny Cochran said in an interview that IT WAS the RIGHT VERDICT for that trial.

KARMA has caught up with OJ. Let's not forget he even stole CABLE! WHAT A CRIMINAL, a scumbag, a murderer, a thief, a HAS been, a convicted felon. He needs to go away & shut up., jmo. :so bored:

LMAO! When OJ was arrested for this crime, I saw an interview with Kim & Fred GOldman on Geraldo.

They said OJ was nothing but a criminal & it was only going to be a matter of time before he was arrested for another murder or criminal act.

Geraldo ask them what their chances of recovery of some of the items in that hotel room & Kim replied, "We got the PRESIDENTIAL ROLEX he was wearing but it was a FAKE!" LOL!

Thank you for informing me on some of this. I suppose i should reserve the right to keep my mouth shut on this one since I do not have all the facts. :roll:

This is a very interesting interview on GMA. A must-see!!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The thing that bothers me is WHY IS SHE coming forward? Her story isn't much different from Nicole's. Nicole was also working as a waitress & very young when she met OJ & started dating him. He was married at the time, but Nicole continued to date him, eventually marrying him.

Without this woman coming forward with this story, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that followed the OJ Simpson trial on a daily basis & seen countless interviews with Nicole's family, of what their relationship was like with the manipulation & abuse.

I'm sorry, I don't feel sympathetic towards her & am disappointed why Gloria Alred has gotten involved with this woman except for the publicity. I have always admired GA but this bothers me. OJ's relationship problems are really not news imo, but I do wonder who is taking care of Nicole's children? Darnell I assume. I feel really sorry for the environment they have grown up in & if it was NOT this woman, it would be another that looks just like her. SAD!

IDK, I thought it was interesting..it showed how OJ sucked in another woman..however..to have any type of relationship with him in any sense is just insane!!

At least she is now married with a baby. What the hell is wrong with some of these women?

wrap, it reminds me of that syndrome of attractive women writing inmates.

Even one of the Menendes Brothers is married & happy. H U G E Waste!

who in their right mind would want to date OJ?
If I were her friend or family members I would have been showing her one of those bloody crime scene pics, everyday until she broke up with him.
what a dumb box of rocks!
how in the hell did she think he would treat her?

I remember when OJ started wearing her on his arm as a trophy and noted how much she resembled Nicole...it seemed like a slap in the face to Nicole's family. I thought she was crazy and would be his next victim. While I'm glad she finally got away alive, I'm skeptical about her reasons for speaking out. Is there a book on the horizon?

frogs wrote:I remember when OJ started wearing her on his arm as a trophy and noted how much she resembled Nicole...it seemed like a slap in the face to Nicole's family. I thought she was crazy and would be his next victim. While I'm glad she finally got away alive, I'm skeptical about her reasons for speaking out. Is there a book on the horizon?

Great questions and comments. Yes, I would bet..book on the way!

of course she was dating him to make a profit. sure wasn't because of his sparkling personality! the only way she can make money from an association with OJ now is by writing a tell-all!
1 Gold-digger's story is just like all the other's. "BooFreaken HOO Get another WALLET"

NiteSpinR wrote: "BooFreaken HOO Get another WALLET"

I thought the same thing.
She can't make it as a waitress, so let's tell all now.

Can you spell L O S E R?? It is like, who in their right mind would date Drew Peterson? This girl is a few fries short!!!!

LEECH.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
June 11, 2010 5:13 p.m. EDT

Attorneys for disgraced gridiron great O.J. Simpson return to court Friday, arguing that the judge at his 2008 armed robbery trial in Las Vegas did not adequately guard against the looming shadow of his notorious past.

Simpson's defense is seeking to reverse his conviction on 12 counts of armed robbery and related offenses in connection with a Las Vegas hotel room confrontation over sports memorabilia. The 62-year-old is serving nine to 33 years in a state prison.

The Nevada Supreme Court agreed to hear his appeal but denied Simpson's request to be freed on bail while his appeals are heard. He will not attend the hearing.

Simpson's Nevada conviction came exactly 13 years after a jury in Los Angeles, California, acquitted him of charges that he murdered his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman in the biggest trial of its time.

Direct references to the murder case were off-limits at the Las Vegas robbery trial, but the figurative elephant trampled into the Las Vegas courtroom as soon as opening statements began.

"You will be able to write that final chapter," Assistant District Attorney Chris Owens told jurors. "The chapter of arrogance and hypocrisy, and that will be the true verdict."

Simpson's attorneys, Yale Galanter and Malcolm P. LaVergne, are arguing to Nevada's Supreme Court that District Court Judge Jackie Glass "gave no deference to the fact that Simpson brought a lot of baggage into the courtroom," did not permit thorough questioning of prospective jurors and should not have allowed prosecutors to dismiss the only two potential African-American members of the panel, leaving an all-white jury to deliver the verdicts on October 3, 2008.

Glass then erred when instructing the jury on the intent required for some of the charges, the attorneys argue in their court papers.

The attorneys also claim that Glass scolded the defense lawyers inappropriately in front of the jury. Miami, Florida-based Galanter appeared to have an especially contentious relationship with Glass, with the judge often admonishing him, "Stop, stop, stop!" and "Sit down!"

In his response filed with the Supreme Court, Clark County District Attorney David Roger argues that the legal rulings during trial were correct and that Glass remained "professional and neutral" in spite of unprofessional behavior by the defense.

"The district court is not at fault for refusing to succumb to the intimidation of veteran attorneys," the prosecutor wrote in his court papers.

During the trial, prosecutors alleged that Simpson had shuttled his sports and personal memorabilia to friends before California authorities descended on his home to seize assets as part of the $33.5 million judgment awarded to the families of Brown and Goldman, who won a wrongful-death verdict in 1997.

According to testimony at his trial, Simpson arranged the heist at Palace Station Hotel and Casino after getting word that football trophies, photographs and other items that he claimed belonged to him were being sold by a sports memorabilia dealer.

During the three-week trial, jurors heard an audio recording of the a confrontation captured by a hidden digital recorder.

"Don't let nobody out of this room," Simpson is heard saying on the profanity-riddled recording. "Think you can steal my s**t and sell it?"

The digital recorder, which sat undetected on an armoire as the room was processed by law enforcement, also captured the banter of Las Vegas investigators about the controversial murder verdict.

"This is great. California didn't get it done; now we'll get it done," one crime scene analyst says, according to a transcription.

Of the five men who accompanied Simpson to Palace Station, four pleaded guilty to reduced charges in exchange for their testimony at trial, leaving only Clarence "C.J." Stewart to face a jury verdict alongside Simpson.

Stewart's defense team argued that their client should be given a separate trial, suggesting that the connection to Simpson would be detrimental.

Stewart was convicted along with Simpson and is serving seven to 27 years. He also is appealing.

Attorney Brent Bryson's argument on behalf of Stewart will be heard by the three-justice panel after Simpson's Friday morning, and his focus will once again be that the men should not have been tried together because of the "spillover effect" of Simpson's case.

"O.J. is a creature created by his own actions, and he has to live with that," Bryson told In Session. "The persona he's created, that the media has created, he's stuck with, but that doesn't mean my client should be stuck. That's exactly why the law allows for severance."

He will NOT get out and he needs to just STOP.

What I find ironic is that he was found (ugh!!!!) Not Guilty on Oct 3, 1995 and found Guilty on Oct 3, 2008.

Warped Speed"...Karma!!!! I always knew that he would end up getting what was coming for him. He is still a violent person. His daughter used to call 911 a lot when they had fights.
I hope he rots in jail, gets up to about 400 lbs and has a stroke on his way to hell.

How do you REALLY feel, Critter?

I guess I was not clear enough in my feelings, huh??? Let's put it this way, he is gross, left his children to find her decapitated (almost) body the next am. SICK SICK SICK!!! whew. :LE: :FBI:

Nearly 20 years after the gruesome murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, Kato Kaelin says he knows who did it: O.J. Simpson.
That’s what Cindy Adams of the New York Post is reporting after an interview with the memorable trial witness.
According to Adams, Kaelin said he was too “terrified” to share his feelings until now.
“The statute of limitations has now passed … so I can now say … yes, he did it,” Kaelin told Adams.
Simpson was found not guilty of the murders back in 1996. He was later found liable for the deaths in civil suit filed by the victims’ families.
The former football hero is currently locked up in a Las Vegas prison for armed robbery.
*Read more about Kaelin’s startling admission, HERE.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Unless you were born after 1996, you know Kato Kaelin. In the Year of Our Lord 1994, Kato Kaelin was famous. Hot. Headlines. Front page. In everyone’s mouth. On everybody’s lips. TV, radio, newspapers. Kindergarten kids crayonned his name. More mentions of Kato and lawyer Kardashian than today’s mentions of Kanye and Kardashian’s kid Kim.
He was a star of O.J. Simpson’s trial for killing his wife, Nicole. At their house that night, he saw, he heard. He knew who, what and where. The prosecution labeled Kaelin a hostile witness. Unemployed, a freeloader, did he tell the truth then? The world smelled O.J.’s guilt. Simpson went free.
Ask Kaelin today, this very minute, if O.J. — currently jailed in Vegas on a separate charge — killed his wife, and I repeat his exact words:
“The statute of limitations has now passed . . . so I can now say . . . yes, he did it.”
Why didn’t he come forward and tell the truth? Ask why he let O.J. Simpson get away with murder, and I repeat his exact words:
“I was too scared. I was terrified.”
Time and his moment have passed. Dearly Beloved, we are gathered here together in memoriam of Kato Kaelin’s dead career. He says: “People hated me. I’ve been spat upon. They threw in my coffee.”
Little bit of a personality, little bit of a talk-show host and guest, little bit of a D-list actor in Z-minus movies, little bit on game shows, poker tournaments, reality things that didn’t make it. He’s now starting a Web site to answer questions, chat personalities, maybe do a book.
Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Kato Kaelin just told TMZ ... he NEVER told the New York Post that he knows OJ Simpson murdered his wife or that he's only coming forward now because the statute of limitations on perjury has run.

Kato says he was shocked when he read the report which quoted him as saying, "The statute of limitations has now passed ... so I can now say ... yes, he did it."

Kato tells TMZ ... he never said any of those things to reporter Cindy Adams or anyone else.

Kato says he has expressed his opinion over the years ... that he THINKS Simpson killed Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman ... but tells us, "I have no first hand knowledge."

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Looks like I jumped the gun way too early on this one, sorry everyone!

The media jumped the gun, Raine! Not you.

Never cared for Cindy Adams. She's another Nancy Grace wannabee. MOO.

Kato is on Dr Drew tonight.....along with the attorneys Gloria and Lisa.

Gloria just told that she pregnant due to a rape when she was young and almost died due to an illegal abortion. I didn't know that before.

October 18, 2012


O.J. Simpson, though found not guilty of the crime of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman, has never been thought of as innocent - at least by many. With 18 years having passed, and the murder weapon never found, the latest rumor in the case is that Simpson is attempting to sell the knife involved.

The report - unsubstantiated - came on Thursday from the National Enquirer. Simpson is reportedly trying to get $5 million for the weapon, in cash, so that the money can't be linked to him. "He's looking for a strictly cash deal so that the money can be deposited in offshore accounts and can't be traced directly to him," a source, described only as someone close to the NFL Hall-of-Famer, told the Enquirer.

While Simpson was found not guilty of the double murder in 1995, he was later found liable for wrongful death in a civil case - which requires a much lower standard - and was ordered to pay $33 million to the victim’s families.

The source believes the former NFL star, who currently serving time for armed robbery as a result of what Simpson claimed was an attempt to retrieve stolen memorabilia, has held onto the knife since the murder trial.

The source said, “O.J. said he’d reveal the location once a firm deal - for a minimum of $5 million - was reached."

Speculation is that Simpson needs the money for his parole hearing for his armed robbery conviction. He is eligible for parole in 2017.

Despite all this, "It’s not just about the money,” the source said. “O.J. will get sick satisfaction from putting one over on the cops and Ron Goldman’s family. He’d love to think he’s outsmarted them.”

Meanwhile, Patrick McKenna, the West Palm Beach private detective hired by Simpson's legal team during the murder trial said he felt that the accusations were ludicrous. "The extent of the search for that knife was phenomenal. It just defies logic that he would have the knife. In my opinion, he is and always has been innocent."

At 12:10 a.m. on June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found murdered outside Brown's Bundy Drive condo in the Brentwood area of Los Angeles, California. O.J. and Nicole had divorced two years prior.

Evidence found and collected at the scene led police to suspect that O.J. Simpson was the murderer, but in a controversial trial and decision, Simpson was found not guilty.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The National Enquirer set off a tabloid frenzy by reporting that O.J. Simpson is selling the knife used to kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

The dagger-like knife is arguably one of the most sought-after murder weapons in American history.

Now, 18 years after the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, reports have surfaced alleging that O.J. Simpson stashed the knife he used to slash their throats in the Bahamas, just a boat trip away from his former Kendall home. The first unconfirmed report, quoting unnamed sources, was published in The National Enquirer, and quickly spread from there.

The Juice, reports say, purportedly wants to sell it as a $5 million souvenir of a perfect crime.

“He’s looking for a strictly cash deal so that the money can be deposited in offshore accounts and can’t be traced directly to him,’’ a source, identified only as someone close to the pro football Hall of Famer, told The Enquirer.

The story made Ron Goldman’s father’s blood boil.

“There has been enormous speculation over the years of where it is and what it is,’’ David Cook, lawyer for Fred Goldman, told The Miami Herald on Thursday about the knife. “It has reached that point where we’ve literally gone into the macabre. ... If this story is to be believed, it is an act of pure narcissism on the part of Simpson.’’

Simpson’s former wife, 35, and her friend, 25, were found beaten and stabbed to death on July 12, 1994, at her home in Brentwood, a tony West Los Angeles neighborhood.

The agent allegedly handling the deal doesn’t know where the knife is, but “insiders” suspect it could be in the Bahamas, a place that would have been easy to get in and out of by boat, the tabloid newspaper said.

But Simpson’s camp said the idea that he would even have the knife is “ludicrous,’’ let alone be trying to sell it.

“The extent of the search for that knife was phenomenal,’’ said Patrick McKenna, the West Palm Beach private detective hired by Simpson’s legal team during the murder trial.

Investigators tore up Simpson’s home, searched every trash can in Los Angeles International Airport, and even pulled out the toilet in the American Airlines jet that O.J. boarded to fly to Chicago after the murders.

“It just defies logic that he would have the knife. In my opinion, he is and always has been innocent,’’ McKenna said.

Simpson, now serving a 33-year prison term in Nevada for robbery, is eligible for parole in 2017, and may need the money to help fund legal battles. J.P. Morgan Chase foreclosed on his Kendall home earlier this year, and Cook said the Goldman family has received a “healthy sum of money” from Simpson’s various holdings, including the home.

While he still earns a sizeable pension from the NFL, those close to him believe that he is broke and not likely to get out of jail anytime soon.

Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of the murders of his former wife and Goldman in “the trial of the century.’’ It was marked by accusations that the evidence had been tainted, and exposed deep rifts in the reaction to the verdict between blacks and whites.

Two years later, Simpson was found liable by a civil jury for Goldman’s death, awarding the Goldman family $33.5 million. Cook said the family received at least $400,000 from the proceeds of Simpson’s book, If I Did It: Confessions of a Killer, and also received money in the former gridiron star’s bankruptcy settlement.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

None of this makes sense.

If he has the knife (murder weapon) he is saying he did it. Period.

Furthermore, who in the hell would want that knife?

No way.

By Graham Winch
updated 7:27 PM EDT, Mon October 22, 2012
NEED TO KNOW
In 2008, O.J. Simpson was convicted of 10 counts relating to armed robbery and kidnapping
He was sentenced to 33 years in prison
Simpson may get a new trial

A judge has reopened O.J. Simpson’s armed robbery and kidnapping case, and the former football star may have to testify to convince the judge to give him a new trial.

Judge Linda Bell ruled Friday that Simpson’s attorneys will have a chance to present evidence at a hearing. There's no date set for that hearing which will determine whether Simpson will be retried for holding a sports memorabilia dealer at gunpoint and stealing multiple items of memorabilia in 2007.

On October 5, 2008, Simpson was convicted on ten counts related to the robbery and sentenced to 33 years in a Nevada prison with eligibility for parole after nine years.

The attorneys representing Simpson during his appeal are arguing that their client had ineffective counsel during that trial in 2008. In Session legal experts say Simpson may have to take the stand to explain how his attorneys failed to provide an adequate defense.

Documents filed with the court say Simpon’s trial attorney, Yale Galanter, had personal financial and business investments that created a conflict of interest making it unethical for him to represent Simpson. The documents also accuse Galanter of not telling Simpson about a plea deal offered by prosecutors. The deal would have meant Simpson would spend as little as two years behind bars. Simpson says he would have taken the plea deal if was told about it. In Session has called the prosecutors to for a comment on the alleged plea deal, but have not heard back.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Nevada judge to set hearing in O.J. Simpson freedom bid

Published November 09, 2012
Associated Press

LAS VEGAS – A Nevada judge will be asked to set a date next spring for evidence hearings in football star O.J. Simpson's bid to prove he was so badly represented by lawyers during his armed robbery and kidnapping case trial three years ago that he should get a new trial.

Simpson won't be in a Las Vegas courtroom for Friday's date-setting conference.

He's serving nine to 33 years in a Nevada prison.

His appeals lawyers, Patricia Palm and Ozzie Fumo, say they expect Clark County District Court Judge Linda Marie Bell will pick a hearing date next April or May.

Simpson was convicted in 2008 of robbing two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas casino hotel room.
He maintained he was retrieving personal items that had been stolen from him.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

KEN RITTER, Associated Press
Updated 10:04 a.m., Friday, November 9, 2012

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A Nevada judge has set a May 13 date for hearings in football star O.J. Simpson's bid to prove he was so badly represented by lawyers in his Las Vegas armed robbery and kidnapping case that he should get a new trial.

Appeals attorneys say they expect Simpson will testify for the first time in the case.

Simpson wasn't in the courtroom for Friday's date-setting conference. He's serving nine to 33 years in state prison for the 2008 conviction of robbing two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas casino hotel room.

Simpson maintained he was retrieving personal items that had been stolen from him.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Posted: 9:18 AM
Last Updated: 2 hours and 7 minutes ago
By: TheIndyChannel.com
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A convicted serial killer claims to be responsible for one of the country’s most notorious murders, according to a documentary set to air on Discovery this week.

The Daily Mail reported early Monday that serial killer Glen Rogers admitted to killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman—the murders for which O.J. Simpson was accused.

Police captured Rogers in Richmond, Kentucky in 1995 after a nationwide manhunt.

Rogers' brother, Clay, told documentary producers that Rogers confessed to the murders.

Allegedly Rogers said that O.J. Simpson hired him to break into Nicole Brown Simpson's home and steal $20,000 diamond earrings and kill her if necessary.

Rogers, who is from Hamilton, Ohio, was reportedly working in the area at the time of the murders and had allegedly even done some work for Brown Simpson.

The documentary also says Rogers boasted about partying with Brown Simpson and provided receipts to show he was in the area.

It also calls into question one of the biggest mysteries in the Simpson murder investigation: A second pair of bloody shoe-prints at the murder scene that were never identified.

Rogers is on death row in Florida. He has admitted to dozens of murders and was convicted of killing two women in 1995.

A jury acquitted O.J. Simpson in the Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman murders in 1995.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

OK. I think this is feasible. I have ALWAYS thought OJ did NOT act alone. Would like to know. If Rogers is admitting to killing Nicole, is he saying OJ murdered Ron Goldman?

BS I say. Remember John Mark Karr saying that he killed Jon Benet Ramsey. This guy is just an attention whore the same as Karr. Show us the money (proof), otherwise shut up!

OJ would have screamed the name of this guy to keep himself out of prison, if this was true, and he didn't.

But he did not go to prison. He was acquitted.

MURDER VICTIM'S DAD
OJ Simpson Killed My Son
... NOT Florida Serial Killer
EXCLUSIVE
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The father of one of O.J. Simpson's victims doesn't believe an alleged confession by a death-row serial killer -- who's now taking credit for the Nicole Brown/Ron Goldman murders -- telling TMZ, OJ's still guilty guilty guilty.

In case you didn't know, a famed serial killer named Glen Rogers -- who's currently on death row in Florida -- has allegedly confessed to murdering Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman ... claiming OJ paid him to break into Nicole's home and steal $20,000 in jewelry ... and kill her if necessary.

The "confession" is the subject of a new documentary on the Investigation Discovery network, airing this week -- but Ron's dad Fred Goldman (a prominent figure in the 1995 OJ trial) insists it's just a BS story to market the show.

Fred says, "OJ Simpson murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The criminal trial showed overwhelming and monumental evidence that OJ Simpson was the killer. There was no contrary evidence other than guess, innuendo, and rumor."

Fred adds, "The fact of the acquittal at the hands of the jury will never wash away this murder from the hands of OJ Simpson, no matter how many Glen Rogers pop up on the media radar screen."

Fred and his lawyer, David Cook, add, "Nothing would change the fact that OJ Simpson murdered these people in cold blood."

For the record -- OJ did it.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

By Radar Staff

O.J. Simpson did not kill ex-wife Nicole and waiter Ron Goldman in the 1994 double murder that spurred the Trial of the Century, a new documentary claims, placing the blame on a serial killer named Glen Rogers.

Rogers is closely profiled in a new documentary by Investigation Discovery called My Brother The Serial Killer, which included interviews with family members, police and legal officials, the NY Post reports.

Rogers -- who boasted to killing as many as 70 people -- told family members that he'd partied with Nicole Simpson in the time before she died and boasted to pals that Nicole was wealthy and he was “going to take her down.”

Rogers, who was in the Southern California area at the time working a construction gig, was extremely familiar with the Brentwood, California crime scene and methodical details of how the killings occurred, the documentary claims.

Watch the video on RadarOnline.com (WARNING: Content Is Graphic)

Rogers claims he was working in concert with O.J. in the killings, as he'd hired him to rob Nicole of $20,000 earrings, telling him to kill “the b***h” if she got in the way.

Rogers' brother Clay, who speaks in the documentary, turned Glen into authorities after discovering the dead body of a man in the family's Hamilton, Minn. cabin. Glen was convicted of killing two women in 1995 and sent to death row, where he told a criminal profiler he was responsible for the deaths of Ron and Nicole.

Simpson in 2006 shopped around a book called If I Did It, which was a macabre, hypothetical walk through of the double murder he claimed he "absolutely, 100 percent" didn't commit.

My Brother The Serial Killer airs on Investigation Discovery Wednesday at 9/8c.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Megyn Kelly spoke with Mark Fuhrman, a detective who played a central role in the investigation. He maintained that the evidence still points overwhelmingly to O.J. Simpson being the killer and called out the Discovery Channel for its decision to air this documentary, which is narrated by Glen Rogers’ brother Clay.

*****

“The Discovery Channel, which might in the future be called ‘The Clueless Channel,’ takes this because (Clay Rogers) is hoping (he) can sell a couple hundred thousand copies of this book before everyone realizes this guy knows nothing, and Glen Rogers knows nothing. And let’s not forget this: Glen Rogers has no appeals left on his death penalty and is awaiting execution. He really has nothing else to do,” Fuhrman said.

Follow the money!!!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I thought that inmates, particularly death row inmates, could not pen a book.

Wrapitup wrote:I thought that inmates, particularly death row inmates, could not pen a book.

Glen Rogers brother Clay Rogers has written a book......plus I'm sure he made some money on the documentary. Wonder how much?

Don't know but that show is on tonight. I do not think it's a stretch that OJ had help. I think this was pre-meditated and there was another set of bloody foot prints they never id'd. Many said OJ's son was the culprit. I am keeping my thoughts on this open for now.